The door of the courtroom then opened, and James Parker
was led to the bar and pleaded guilty to the forgery of the
check in question. (For the benefit of the layman it should
be explained that as a rule indictments for forgery also
contain a count for "uttering.") He then took the stand,
admitted that he had not only uttered but had also written the
check, and swore that it was his handwriting which, appeared
on the pad.
The prosecutor was nonplussed. If he should ask the witness
to prove his capacity to forge such a check from memory on the
witness-stand, the latter, as he had ample time to practise
the signature while in prison, would probably succeed in doing
so. If, on the other hand, he should not ask him to write the
name, the defendant's counsel would argue to the jury that he
was afraid to do so. The district attorney therefore took the
bull by the horns and challenged Parker to make from memory a
copy of the signature, and, much as he had suspected, the
witness produced a very good one.
Pages:
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265