The other is still pending and the defendant
awaiting his trial. Certainly there is little in the actual
figures to give color to the impression that the criminal
profits by mere technicalities on appeal,--at least in New
York State.
In nine cases out of ten the reversal of a conviction in a
criminal case is due to the carelessness or inefficiency of
the prosecuting officer or trial judge and not to any
inadequacy in our methods of procedure. Yet the tenth case,
the case where the criminal does beat the law by a
technicality, does more harm than can easily be estimated.
That is the one case everybody knows about, the one the papers
descant upon, the one that cheers the heart of the grafter and
every criminal who can afford to pay a lawyer.
Yet the evil influence of the reversal of a conviction on
appeal, however much it is to be deprecated, is as nothing
compared with a deliberate acquittal of a guilty defendant by
a reckless, sentimental, or lawless jury. Few can appreciate
as does a prosecutor the actual, practical and immediate
effect of such a spectacle upon those who witness it.
Pages:
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278